[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Closed: (EJBTHREE-1367) InfinitePool makes SFSB passivation meaningless
Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Sat May 17 09:04:23 EDT 2008
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1367?page=all ]
Brian Stansberry closed EJBTHREE-1367.
--------------------------------------
Resolution: Done
Fixed by removing use of the pool from SFSB creation/destruction; now handled by StatefulContainer itself.
A remaining issue is the creation of the pool is done in superclass Ejb3Container, but AFAICT the pool is only used in StatelessContainer, not in StatefulContainer or ServiceContainer. See EJBTHREE-1370.
> InfinitePool makes SFSB passivation meaningless
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: EJBTHREE-1367
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1367
> Project: EJB 3.0
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: AS 4.2.0 GA, AS 4.2.1.GA, AS 4.2.2.GA, AS 5.0.0.Beta4
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assigned To: Brian Stansberry
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: AS 5.0.0.CR1
>
>
> InfinitePool maintains a list of all objects that have been created and not yet removed. For SFSBs this essentially functions as a second cache and makes passivation pointless, since passivating from the SFSB cache doesn't remove the ref in the InfinitePool.
> IIRC, the intent in 5.x is to get rid of the use of pools for SFSBs, but this is broken in 4.x as well.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list