[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBRULES-966) update(fact) in 2 rules dont check for other updated facts - a loop is created
David Hill (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Sat Oct 25 22:50:20 EDT 2008
[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12435484#action_12435484 ]
David Hill commented on JBRULES-966:
------------------------------------
I am experiencing the same error on the latest Drools 4.0.7
I wrapped an immutable Double inside of another object so I could mutate it as well as have a distinct class name to match rules on. From the java code I put a single one of these objects into the facts, then two different rules try to add to the value of this fact. The rules are both marked no-loop and activation-group with unique group names. When I use the update command in the two rules they bounce back and forth forever, when I don't use the update then other LHS when conditions based on this number do not get evaluated.
public class Score {
private Double score;
public Score(Double score){
this.score = score;
}
public void add(Double value){
this.score += value;
}
public String toString() {
return "score=" + score;
}
public Double getScore() {
return score;
}
}
rule "bootstrap1"
salience 100
activation-group "boot1"
no-loop
when
... some stuff ...
$s : Score();
then
$s.add(1.23);
update($s);
System.out.println("score initialized to " + $s.getScore());
end
rule "#1 whatever"
activation-group "#1"
salience 99
no-loop
when
... some stuff ...
$s : Score();
then
$s.add($c1.getValue() / 14.0);
update($s);
System.out.println("score updated to " + $s);
end
> update(fact) in 2 rules dont check for other updated facts - a loop is created
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBRULES-966
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-966
> Project: JBoss Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: drools-core (expert)
> Affects Versions: 4.0.0.MR3
> Environment: tested on eclipse 3.2, JBossRules 4.0MR3, OS Mac OSX 10.4.10
> Reporter: Felipe Piccolini
> Assignee: Edson Tirelli
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.0.0.GA
>
>
> When using update in 2 rules that update the same object... a loop is created even when trying to
> avoid the loop adding an extra condition to each rule inserting an ArrayList as a fact too, so each rule should not be
> evaluated again...
> //-------RULES-----------------------------
> package org.drools.test
> #list any import classes here.
> import java.util.List
> import java.util.ArrayList
> import cl.bluesoft.test.rules.Fact
> #declare any global variables here
> rule "test update A"
> salience 699
> no-loop
> when
> $f : Fact($n: number > 0)
> $list: ArrayList( this excludes "key1")
> then
> System.out.println("A-fact number1:"+$f.getNumber()+" list 1:"+$list);
> $list.add("key1");
> $f.setNumber($n + 1);
> update ($f);
> update ($list);
> System.out.println("A-fact number2:"+$f.getNumber()+" list 2:"+$list);
> end
> rule "test update B"
> salience 699
> no-loop
> when
> $f : Fact($n: number > 1)
> $list: ArrayList( this excludes "key2")
> then
> System.out.println("B-fact number1:"+$f.getNumber()+" list 1:"+$list);
> $list.add("key2");
> $f.setNumber($n + 1);
> update ($f);
> update ($list);
> System.out.println("B-fact number2:"+$f.getNumber()+" list 2:"+$list);
> end
> //-------FACT-----------------------------
> public class Fact implements Serializable {
> private static final long serialVersionUID = 331627137981862975L;
>
> private int number;
>
> public Fact(int number){
> this.number = number;
> }
>
> public Fact(){
> this(0);
> }
> /**
> * @return the number
> */
> public int getNumber() {
> return number;
> }
> /**
> * @param number the number to set
> */
> public void setNumber(int number) {
> this.number = number;
> }
>
> }
> //------TEST---------
> public class TestUpdateFact implements Serializable {
> private static final long serialVersionUID = -574789596641083743L;
> /**
> * @param args
> */
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> RuleBase ruleBase = RuleBaseFactory.newRuleBase();
> Package pkg = builder.getPackage();
> ....
> WorkingMemory session = ruleBase.getStatefulSession();
> ...etc etc...
> List list = new ArrayList();
> Fact fact1 = new Fact(1);
> session.insert(fact1 false);
> session.insert(list, false);
> session.fireAllRules();
> session.dispose();
>
> }
> }
> //--------OUTPUT------------
> A-fact number1:1 list 1:[]
> A-fact number2:2 list 2:[key1]
> B-fact number1:2 list 1:[key1]
> B-fact number2:3 list 2:[key1, key2]
> A-fact number1:3 list 1:[key1, key2]
> A-fact number2:4 list 2:[key1, key2, key1]
> B-fact number1:4 list 1:[key1, key2, key1]
> B-fact number2:5 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2]
> A-fact number1:5 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2]
> A-fact number2:6 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1]
> B-fact number1:6 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1]
> B-fact number2:7 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2]
> A-fact number1:7 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2]
> A-fact number2:8 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2, key1]
> B-fact number1:8 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2, key1]
> .... for ever.....
> So a loop is created... only when I use update and both rules... condition about the
> list not containing "key1" and "key2" seems not properly chequed...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list