[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBBUILD-534) Maven repository aggregation

[Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)]

    [ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBBUILD-534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12477639#action_12477639 ] 

Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBBUILD-534:
---------------------------------------------

yes - exactly, its not really solvable if product binaries are considered different.
Then the dependency set will have to be different for both project and product builds which will lead to horrible maintanence headache ;(

> Maven repository aggregation
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBBUILD-534
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBBUILD-534
>             Project: JBoss Build System
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Maven Builds
>            Reporter: Thomas Diesler
>
> There are a number of projects which have dependencies on non-jboss
> maven repos (jboss-osgi is one of them)
> http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235779#4235779
> I believe, this issue is general enough to have proper repo aggregation 
> setup somehow
> Here is a link to some aggregators
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Maven+Repository+Manager+Feature+Matrix
> Is this a way you want to move forward or should we stick with manually copying individual artefacts to the jboss repo? 
> Please note, that by doing so (i.e. mvn deploy-file) you loose the original pom and hence the information on transitive dependencies.
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-deploy-plugin/deploy-file-mojo.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira