[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBMETA-171) jboss_4_2.dtd differs from the one found in Branch_4_2

[Alexey Loubyansky (JIRA)]

    [ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMETA-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12457905#action_12457905 ] 

Alexey Loubyansky commented on JBMETA-171:
------------------------------------------

Meaningful difference is between the ordering of proxy-factory-config:
Branch_4_2
<!ELEMENT proxy-factory-config (client-interceptors? , activation-config? , endpoint-interceptors? , 
web-class-loader? , JMSProviderAdapterJNDI? , ServerSessionPoolFactoryJNDI? , 

metadata (the same in both jboss_4_2.dtd and jboss_5_0.dtd)
<!ELEMENT proxy-factory-config (client-interceptors?, endpoint-interceptors? , web-class-loader? ,
activation-config?, JMSProviderAdapterJNDI? , ServerSessionPoolFactoryJNDI? , 

I don't know for which reason. In Java proxy-factory-config is represented as org.w3c.dom.Element (so, no ordering is defined in Java binding). I am thinking of changing it back to the ordering as in Branch_4_2.

Other changes are added comments for the child elements of cluster-config.

> jboss_4_2.dtd differs from the one found in Branch_4_2
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBMETA-171
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMETA-171
>             Project: JBoss Metadata
>          Issue Type: Task
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>            Reporter: Dimitris Andreadis
>            Assignee: Alexey Loubyansky
>
> Which is correct?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira