[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JGRP-976) JGroups testsuite failures with link-local IPv6 addresses
Richard Achmatowicz (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Fri May 15 09:49:46 EDT 2009
[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JGRP-976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12467769#action_12467769 ]
Richard Achmatowicz commented on JGRP-976:
------------------------------------------
I've started an intersting discussion with Neil Horman on fedora-devel mailing list, concerning why there are static rules for routing traffic along lo instead of letting it go out onto eth0.
It looks as though there are also some problems with IPv6 routing table entries which may be involved in this problem.
Going to file a bug on at least one of the issues which seem to be appearing.
> JGroups testsuite failures with link-local IPv6 addresses
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-976
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JGRP-976
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Environment: Sun JDK 1.6.0_13, Fedora 8, IPv6 link-local addresses
> Reporter: Richard Achmatowicz
> Assignee: Richard Achmatowicz
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.8
>
> Attachments: BuggyServerSocketSender.java
>
>
> These failures is turning up when we run the JGroups 2.4.6.GA testsuite with scoped link-local addresses - MergeTest / DisconnectTest and MultiplexerMergeTest are failing with this exception:
> [junit] 4603 [DEBUG] NAKACK.handleMessage(): - fe80:0:0:0:215:58ff:fec8:81a8%eth0:35158: received fe80:0:0:0:215:58ff:fec8:81a8%eth0:35158#0
> [junit] 4603 [DEBUG] NAKACK.handleMessage(): - fe80:0:0:0:215:58ff:fec8:81a8%eth0:35158: received fe80:0:0:0:215:58ff:fec8:81a8%eth0:35158#0
> [junit] 4607 [DEBUG] RouterStub.reconnect(): - failed reconnecting
> [junit] java.net.SocketException: Invalid argument or cannot assign requested address
> [junit] at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
> [junit] at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(PlainSocketImpl.java:333)
> [junit] at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(PlainSocketImpl.java:195)
> [junit] at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(PlainSocketImpl.java:182)
> [junit] at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:366)
> [junit] at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:519)
> [junit] at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:469)
> [junit] at java.net.Socket.<init>(Socket.java:366)
> [junit] at java.net.Socket.<init>(Socket.java:240)
> [junit] at org.jgroups.stack.RouterStub.connect(RouterStub.java:143)
> [junit] at org.jgroups.stack.RouterStub.reconnect(RouterStub.java:363)
> [junit] at org.jgroups.stack.RouterStub.reconnect(RouterStub.java:379)
> [junit] at org.jgroups.protocols.TUNNEL$Reconnector.run(TUNNEL.java:446)
> I believe this may be a Sun JDK bug. Commenst to follow will explain.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list