[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-4383) Allow a different JSF implementation to be packaged in the WAR

Thu Apr 1 07:51:39 EDT 2010

    [ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-4383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12523394#action_12523394 ] 

Stan Silvert commented on JBAS-4383:
------------------------------------

BTW, I'd encourage you to try JSF 2.0.  There's a lot to like.

> Allow a different JSF implementation to be packaged in the WAR
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBAS-4383
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-4383
>             Project: JBoss Application Server
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: JSF
>    Affects Versions: JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta2, JBossAS-4.2.0.CR2
>            Reporter: Stan Silvert
>            Assignee: Stan Silvert
>             Fix For: JBossAS-4.2.0.GA,  JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta3, JBossAS-5.0.0.CR1
>
>
> Prior to JEE5, most developers would bundle a JSF implementation such as MyFaces with the WAR.  With AS 4.2 and 5.0, you should instead rely on the JSF implementation that ships with the container.
> However, for these legacy applications that rely on a particular implementation, we can disable the built-in JSF implementation as long as you stick with the default classloader settings.  To disable the built-in JSF, you will add this to your web.xml:
> <context-param>
>      <param-name>org.jboss.jbossfaces.WAR_BUNDLES_JSF_IMPL</param-name>
>      <param-value>true</param-value>
> </context-param>

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira