[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (EJBTHREE-2183) @AccessTimeout with values 0 or -1 should be treated differently than positive values

jaikiran pai (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Oct 21 05:26:54 EDT 2010


     [ https://jira.jboss.org/browse/EJBTHREE-2183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

jaikiran pai updated EJBTHREE-2183:
-----------------------------------

    Component Fix Version(s): jboss-ejb3-concurrency:1.0.0-alpha-3  (was: jboss-ejb3-concurrency:1.0.0-alpha-2)


> @AccessTimeout with values 0 or -1 should be treated differently than positive values
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: EJBTHREE-2183
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/EJBTHREE-2183
>             Project: EJB 3.0
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: concurrency
>    Affects Versions: depchain-1.0.0-alpha-4
>            Reporter: jaikiran pai
>            Assignee: jaikiran pai
>             Fix For: depchain-1.0.0
>
>
> The EJB3.1 spec, section Section 4.8.5.5.1 says:
> "An @AccessTimeout value of -1 indicates that the client request will block indefinitely until forward progress can be made.
> An @AccessTimeout value of 0 indicates that concurrent access is not allowed. Access attempts on methods with a timeout value of 0 result in a javax.ejb.ConcurrentAccessException."
> We currently don't handle these values and just pass them to Lock.tryLock(), which as per its javadoc says:
> "If the time is less than or equal to zero, the method will not wait at all. "
> This breaks the EJB3.1 spec expectation.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


More information about the jboss-jira mailing list