[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-9264) BoundedQueueThreadPoolService provides Executor instead of ExecutorService
David Lloyd (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Fri Apr 8 11:35:33 EDT 2011
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-9264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12594527#comment-12594527 ]
David Lloyd commented on JBAS-9264:
-----------------------------------
It's just the way the services shook out. Really none of them *should* provide a service, unless it's locked down (in which case all of them *could*). If however you want to change it so they all expose ExecutorService (or BlockingExecutorService as the case may be) via the delegate methods in Executors, I'd accept that patch.
> BoundedQueueThreadPoolService provides Executor instead of ExecutorService
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBAS-9264
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-9264
> Project: JBoss Application Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Domain Management
> Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Beta2
> Reporter: Paul Ferraro
>
> Currently, there is no thread service that provides a j.u.c.ExecutorService using a bounded queue thread pool.
> The existing BoundedQueueThreadPoolService only provides a j.u.c.Executor, instead of the far more useful j.u.c.ExecutorService. The exposed j.u.c.Executor cannot even be cast to an j.u.c.ExecutorService, since the underlying QueueExecutor is wrapped by a decorator that does not implement j.u.c.ExecutorService.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list