[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBRULES-1322) Build in accumulate functions are highly unreliable for long's and BigDecimals
Edson Tirelli (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Tue May 17 15:40:01 EDT 2011
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-1322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Edson Tirelli updated JBRULES-1322:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: FUTURE
(was: 5.2.0.CR1)
> Build in accumulate functions are highly unreliable for long's and BigDecimals
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBRULES-1322
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-1322
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: drools-compiler
> Affects Versions: 4.0.3
> Reporter: Geoffrey De Smet
> Assignee: Edson Tirelli
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: FUTURE
>
> Attachments: JBRULES-1322-testcase.patch
>
>
> When dealing with financial data, one should never ever use double's. Instead BigDecimal should be used.
> Not because BigDecimal is bigger (that's rarely a problem) but because it doesn't do any decimal to binary transformation.
> For example, it's impossible for a double to correctly represent "0.2", aka 1/5.
> Summing many doubles (or even a few differing in scale), can easily give wrong results (and for financial data this tends to be important).
> Using doubles to sum longs have the exact same problem.
> Attached is a testcase patch which proves this by checking if (MAX_LONG - 4L) and 3L sum up to be (MAX_LONG - 1L).
> Currently they don't.
> One possible way to solve this is to fix JBRULES-1075,
> which just happens to give drools-solver 3% more performance ;) what a coincidence ^^
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list