[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1383) ConcurrentModificationException in BasicConnectionTable.retainAll
Dennis Reed (Updated) (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Nov 3 15:14:46 EDT 2011
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Dennis Reed updated JGRP-1383:
------------------------------
Attachment: JGRP-1383-test.tgz
> ConcurrentModificationException in BasicConnectionTable.retainAll
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-1383
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1383
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.6.20
> Reporter: Dennis Reed
> Assignee: Dennis Reed
> Fix For: 2.6.21
>
> Attachments: JGRP-1383-test.tgz
>
>
> java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
> at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.nextEntry(HashMap.java:793)
> at java.util.HashMap$KeyIterator.next(HashMap.java:828)
> at java.util.AbstractSet.removeAll(AbstractSet.java:154)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.BasicConnectionTable.retainAll(BasicConnectionTable.java:344)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TCP.retainAll(TCP.java:59)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.BasicTCP.handleDownEvent(BasicTCP.java:265)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TP.down(TP.java:1145)
> ...
> BasicTCP is missing a synchoronize on "members" when it passes it to TCP.retainAll.
> If members is modified by another thread (in TP.handleDownEvent) while BasicConnectionTable's Set.removeAll
> call is iterating over it, it triggers a ConcurrentModificationException.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list