[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (AS7-2234) Consider separate namespace for management model

[Brian Stansberry (Updated) (JIRA)]

     [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-2234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Brian Stansberry updated AS7-2234:
----------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 7.1.0.CR1

    
> Consider separate namespace for management model
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AS7-2234
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-2234
>             Project: Application Server 7
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Domain Management
>            Reporter: Thomas Diesler
>            Assignee: Brian Stansberry
>             Fix For: 7.1.0.CR1
>
>
> Related to [Finding out what version of the Detyped API a client is dealing with|http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-as7-dev/2011-October/004206.html]
> we currently have 
> {code}
> [standalone at localhost:9999 /] /subsystem=osgi:read-resource-description
> {
>     "outcome" => "success",
>     "result" => {
>         "description" => "The the OSGi subsystem configuration.",
>         "head-comment-allowed" => true,
>         "tail-comment-allowed" => true,
>         "namespace" => "urn:jboss:domain:osgi:1.0",
>         "attributes" => {
>             "activation" => {
>                 "description" => "Activation flag for the OSGi subsystem. Possible values: lazy, eager.",
>                 "type" => STRING,
>                 "default" => "LAZY",
>                 "access-type" => "read-write",
>                 "restart-required" => "no-services",
>                 "storage" => "configuration"
>             },
>             "startlevel" => {
>                 "description" => "The current Start Level of the OSGi Framework. Changing this value will change the start level of the Framework accordingly. ",
>                 "type" => INT,
>                 "access-type" => "read-write",
>                 "restart-required" => "no-services",
>                 "storage" => "runtime"
>             }
>         },
>         "children" => {
>             "configuration" => {"description" => "A configuration entry."},
>             "property" => {"description" => "A framework property."},
>             "capability" => {"description" => "A framework capability."},
>             "bundle" => {"description" => "Runtime bundle information."}
>         }
>     }
> }
> {code}
> The namespace definition of the model
> {code}
> "namespace" => "urn:jboss:domain:osgi:1.0",
> {code}
> is that of the XML representation - worse, it is that of an outdated XML representation.
> Some subsystems do not define a namespace for their model at all.
> I suggest to define an individual namespace per subsystem with some compatibility rule encoded within. 
> Management clients can then decide whether and to what extend they can manage that subsystem.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira