[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1250) Quality of service properties per message

Bela Ban (Commented) (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Tue Nov 29 10:10:40 EST 2011


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646357#comment-12646357 ] 

Bela Ban commented on JGRP-1250:
--------------------------------

OK, changed API to use enums Flag and TransientFlag, plus backported to 3.0.2
                
> Quality of service properties per message
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JGRP-1250
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1250
>             Project: JGroups
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>            Reporter: Bela Ban
>            Assignee: Bela Ban
>             Fix For: 3.0.2, 3.1
>
>
> JGroups already has the ability to bypass certain protocols, e.g. NO_FC set in a message bypasses any flow control layer. 
> It would be nice to do this for other protocols, too, e.g. SEQUENCER, but this needs to be done in a generic fashion.
> What should be done is to use *properties*, e.g. +reliable-mcast, -frag, +flowcontrol, -bundling etc. Based on these flags, each protocol decides whether to handle (or not) a message. The properties should not take up *any* space in a message if not set.
> This can probably be generalized, ie. by annotating a protocol with the props it provides, e.g. @Reliable @ReliableUnicast UNICAST, and by having code which matches the flags in a message and decides whether or not to process the message.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


More information about the jboss-jira mailing list