[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (AS7-1614) Support remote sockets in interface and socket-binding handling
Brian Stansberry (Assigned) (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Mon Oct 24 12:09:45 EDT 2011
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Brian Stansberry reassigned AS7-1614:
-------------------------------------
Assignee: jaikiran pai
Jaikiran, I just found this earlier variant of the client-socket-binding stuff. I'm assigning to you just as an FYI.
The system property substitution stuff for creating URLs based on socket binding is out of scope for what you are doing.
> Support remote sockets in interface and socket-binding handling
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AS7-1614
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-1614
> Project: Application Server 7
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: jaikiran pai
> Fix For: 7.1.0.Beta1
>
>
> Support configs for remote interfaces and socket bindings in the domain model. See referenced dev list thread for a use case, as well as my comment on https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-as/pull/192.
> From the dev list thread:
> Another thing to deal with is interface resolution. With the exception
> of the "<loopback address="127.0.0.4"/> criteria Scott added, resolving
> an interface means finding a NIC on the machine that matches the
> criteria. If that can't be done, it's an error condition. To avoid that
> there would need to be some new criteria added (e.g.
> <remote-inet-address value="10.0.0.53"/>) or an attribute added to the
> existing inet-address criteria (e.g. <inet-address value="10.0.0.53"
> local="false"/>.
> A minor issue relates to changing the configuration of a socket binding.
> Basically, we try and track whether you've used a particular
> SocketBinding service to open a socket; if not we let you change the
> binding config without requiring a server restart or reload. This
> connection-url stuff won't use the SocketBinding service to create a
> socket, so the binding will be editable at runtime with no
> reload/restart required. But there's no dependency relationship between
> the binding and the datasource, so that change is not going to be
> reflected in the datasource. This is just an example of the general
> problem with using system properties as an injection mechanism.
> I don't think this last point is a blocker, it just requires documentation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list