[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-1874) Inconsistent access control response structures

[Brian Stansberry (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797420#comment-12797420 ] 

Brian Stansberry commented on WFLY-1874:
----------------------------------------

"So the question is if we should always add the override so it appears in the list, or if we should make it appear in the list by other means."

I believe the former would mean adding an override that doesn't actually override, and then when the resource DS is enabled removing it and replacing it with the current override.

And then reversing that during disable.

Sounds doable but tricky.
                
> Inconsistent access control response structures
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WFLY-1874
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1874
>             Project: WildFly
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>          Components: Domain Management
>            Reporter: Heiko Braun
>            Assignee: Kabir Khan
>             Fix For: 8.0.0.Beta1
>
>         Attachments: standalone-full-ha.xml
>
>
> Compare the access control meta data for the different rrd() requests:
> a) https://gist.github.com/heiko-braun/6229507
> b) https://gist.github.com/heiko-braun/6229497
> It happens on a system with two datasources confgured (ExampleDS & Test). You can find the server config attached to this issues.
> What we are looking for is a reliable response structure, without any ambiguity.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira