[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1613) FORK: cactus stacks
Bela Ban (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Fri Jul 12 09:07:22 EDT 2013
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789341#comment-12789341 ]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-1613:
--------------------------------
The difference to a MuxRpc/MessageDispatcher is that a MuxMessageDispatcher allows many applications to use the *same* stack configuration, whereas FORK would allow different applications to use different stack configurations. With a MuxMessageDispatcher, one could for example not add a new protocol such as CENTRAL_LOCK or COUNTER to the stack, whereas this is possible with FORK.
> FORK: cactus stacks
> -------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-1613
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1613
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Reporter: Bela Ban
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 3.4
>
> Attachments: IMAG0129.jpg
>
>
> Introduce cactus stacks where we can have multiple, different, stacks grafted onto the same base stack.
> The problem today is that different applications need different functionality (protocol stack configs) in the AS. For example, we have the default stack used by AS. Then, Hibernate Search wants to use distributed locking (CENTRAL_LOCK) and counting (COUNTER). The total order stack wants to use TOA/SEQUENCER and so on.
> Cactus stacks add the ability to:
> * Provide custom (partial) stacks that are grafted onto a base stack
> * Add/remove stacks at runtime
> See the attached picture for details.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list