[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6778) Configure EJB3/MDB with an individual thread pool for each EJB.
Weixing Sun (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Mar 28 04:42:42 EDT 2013
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763686#comment-12763686 ]
Weixing Sun commented on AS7-6778:
----------------------------------
Hi Jaikiran,
Thanks for your comments!
I think we should use the asynchronous invocation from the web container to the EJB container.
If we have multiple tiers defined, we may have to define how many system threads for JSP/Servlet, and how many for EJB/MDB, JMS and WebService.
Furthermore, the thread pools could be assigned to specific components, otherwise they will use the default one.
That's the thread pools of other commercial appservers implemented.
We are having some bottleneck when increasing the threads for each components.
Thanks and regards
Weixing
> Configure EJB3/MDB with an individual thread pool for each EJB.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AS7-6778
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6778
> Project: Application Server 7
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: EJB
> Affects Versions: EAP 6.1.0.Alpha (7.2.0.Final)
> Reporter: Jeremy Whiting
> Assignee: jaikiran pai
>
> For performance of an application to be scalable I need to configure sometimes a thread pool to an EJB. The pool is not shared with other EJB in the deployed application.
> For example
> PoolA - EJB Dog
> PoolB - EJB Cat
> To configure this the ability no define the thread pool name for an EJB. Rather than an EJB to the shared thread pool as it currently works.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list