[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3721) CommandDispatcher hides exceptions
Paul Ferraro (JIRA)
issues at jboss.org
Wed Aug 13 15:10:31 EDT 2014
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12992756#comment-12992756 ]
Paul Ferraro commented on WFLY-3721:
------------------------------------
I think the clearest strategy is to throw an exception. We should keep this behavior consistent with all of the methods on CommandDispatcher. This also draws a clear distinction between a sender exceptions vs receiver-specific exceptions, the latter of which are exposed by the ExecutionException thrown by Future.get() or CommandResponse.get().
> CommandDispatcher hides exceptions
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3721
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3721
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Clustering
> Affects Versions: 8.1.0.Final
> Reporter: Rich DiCroce
> Assignee: Paul Ferraro
>
> The implementations of CommandDispatcher#submitOnCluster and #executeOnCluster completely hide any exceptions that occur while trying to send the command. This makes it very difficult to debug things like serialization exceptions. (Note: In the 8.x branch, the implementation is in ServiceCommandDispatcher. In master, it has moved to ChannelCommandDispatcher, but the code is essentially the same and the issue still exists.)
> Instead of hiding the exception, the implementation should expose the exception to the developer in some way. A couple possibilities:
> - Don't catch the exception.
> - Catch the exception and return a Map with one entry, where the key is the local node and the value is a Future or CommandResponse that contains the exception.
> - Catch the exception and return an empty map, but also log the exception.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list