[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3588) Undertow subsystem should support arbitrary options

[David Lloyd (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12983202#comment-12983202 ] 

David Lloyd commented on WFLY-3588:
-----------------------------------

It's probably better to stick with naming based on the actual options' purpose, e.g. "acceptor-options" versus "channel-options" might be a good distinction.  If we're supporting (mostly) predefined attributes for this purpose then these options should be separately grouped to reuse the same XSD data types and also to keep the distinction clear.

> Undertow subsystem should support arbitrary options
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WFLY-3588
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3588
>             Project: WildFly
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: Web (Undertow)
>            Reporter: Stuart Douglas
>            Assignee: Tomaz Cerar
>
> At the moment all well known options are hard coded in the schema. We should also support dynamic options where the class name is specified. This will allow the use of user defined options.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)