[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1215) import function(s) with collision on declared Pojo field names odd behavior and no warning

[Matteo Mortari (JIRA)]

     [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Matteo Mortari closed DROOLS-1215.
----------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix


> import function(s) with collision on declared Pojo field names odd behavior and no warning
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DROOLS-1215
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1215
>             Project: Drools
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core engine
>    Affects Versions: 6.4.0.Final
>            Reporter: Matteo Mortari
>            Assignee: Matteo Mortari
>         Attachments: DROOLS-1215.zip
>
>
> Hello,
> not sure (yet) what is causing this odd behavior, but considering the following rule-base in the attached reproducer, evolved from the usual kie example archetype:
> {code}
> global java.util.Set controlSet;
> rule "will execute per each Measurement having ID color"
> no-loop
> when
> 	WantToKeep( condition == "color" )
> 	Measurement( id == "color", $colorVal : val )
> then
> 	controlSet.add($colorVal);
> end
> declare WantToKeep
> 	condition : String
> end
> rule "kickstart"
> salience 999
> when
> 	eval( true ) 
> then
> 	insert(new WantToKeep( "color" ));
> end
> {code}
> This works as expected until adding the following import statement:
> {code}
> import function org.jooq.impl.DSL.*;
> {code}
> and then the test will fail.
> I suspect because some "functions"/static method exists on {{org.jooq.impl.DSL}} with name "condition" which is colliding with the declared Pojo field name "condition", but I can't understand why this supposed collision happens as in the LHS I'm looking for the field not a method invocation with the {{condition()}} form.
> I'm willing to investigate more on this later, for the time being I thought worthy at least to raise this JIRA record for tracking.
> I will attach reproducer and workaround in the appropriate sections.
> Thank you,
> Ciao,
> MM



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)