[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-9252) Redundant config restore before quorum configuration

Radoslav Husar (JIRA) issues at jboss.org
Wed Aug 23 15:44:00 EDT 2017


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453362#comment-13453362 ] 

Radoslav Husar commented on WFLY-9252:
--------------------------------------

[~sgilda] I think that's good you added it - users will start from the exact same place so it will be less confusing - so the change here is mostly cosmetic. Maybe you were hitting the issue where toggling the policy was problematic (JBEAP-12252). Should you be trying these out again and hit the issue again, please let me know what the issue is.

> Redundant config restore before quorum configuration
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WFLY-9252
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9252
>             Project: WildFly
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Quickstarts
>    Affects Versions: 11.0.0.Beta1
>            Reporter: Radoslav Husar
>            Assignee: Radoslav Husar
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: eap7.1-ok-for-CR1
>             Fix For: 11.0.0.CR1
>
>
> In ER3 there is a new instruction in {{Configure a Quorum for the Singleton Policy}} to restore the singleton election policy to default configuration:
> {{If you have tested other election policies that configured the singleton subsystem, see Restoring the Default Singleton Subsystem Configuration for instructions to restore the singleton election policy to the default configuration.}}
> I think this step should be either removed or reworded to avoid confusion. The reasons are:
> * Quorum can be specified for any election policy, not only for the default one.
> * Wording {{If you have tested other election policies}} suggests that this section configures another election policy, which is not true - it only adds quorum to existing election policy.
> [~rhusar], what do you think?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)


More information about the jboss-jira mailing list