[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-9529) Using injected JMS in a background task/thread leads to NameNotFoundException: java:comp/TransactionSynchronizationRegistry

[Scott Van Wart (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13505279#comment-13505279 ] 

Scott Van Wart commented on WFLY-9529:
--------------------------------------

[~emmartins] does the startup delay you put in injected-jms2.zip work around this issue?  I'm at the point where I'll need to just start using an injected ConnectionFactory and manage my own JMSContext objects. I've noticed that it doesn't happen all the time (but sometimes will happen consistently--as in the original project I attached).

> Using injected JMS in a background task/thread leads to NameNotFoundException: java:comp/TransactionSynchronizationRegistry
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WFLY-9529
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9529
>             Project: WildFly
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JMS, Naming
>    Affects Versions: 10.1.0.Final, 11.0.0.Final
>         Environment: Running on Windows 10, Java 64-bit 1.8.0_131
>            Reporter: Scott Van Wart
>            Assignee: Eduardo Martins
>              Labels: ActiveMQ, jms, transaction
>         Attachments: injected-jms.zip, injected-jms2.zip, wildfly-11-injected-jms.txt
>
>
> If I try to use an @Injected JMSContext while executing within a background task (ManagedExecutorService) or thread (ManagedThreadFactory), I get the attached stacktrace. I've experienced this a number of times with Wildfly 10.1.0, including messages sent in Infinispan's expiry task thread.
> My original workaround was to submit an additional task on a separate thread to send the message, then wait for it to complete.  That seemed unreliable (sometimes it would still produce NameNotFoundException).  I've resorted to creating my own JMSContext by using @Resource( lookup="java:/ConnectionFactory" ) and sending messages that way.  Both workarounds prevent the message sending logic from participating in any ongoing transactions.
> I'm also attaching a sample EAR project.  It can be built with Maven.  It creates a background task that waits 3 seconds and then tries to send a JMS message in a new transaction using an injected JMS context. I use the standalone-full.xml profile to run it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)