[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-4625) EJB SecurityContextInterceptor attempts JAAS login which doesn't work for JASPIC authentications
RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
issues at jboss.org
Tue Jan 17 08:08:03 EST 2017
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-4625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13349552#comment-13349552 ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on WFLY-4625:
-----------------------------------------------
Petr Penicka <ppenicka at redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1243553|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243553] from VERIFIED to CLOSED
> EJB SecurityContextInterceptor attempts JAAS login which doesn't work for JASPIC authentications
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-4625
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-4625
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Reporter: arjan tijms
> Assignee: Stefan Guilhen
> Labels: authentication, ejb, jaspi, jaspic, security, security-context
> Fix For: 9.0.0.CR2, 10.0.0.Alpha2
>
>
> After a user has successfully authenticated with JASPIC it's not possible to access any method in a secured EJB bean, irrespective of the actual security constraints.
> The problem is that when an EJB is "secured" an extra interceptor is added to the chain: {{org.jboss.as.ejb3.security.SecurityContextInterceptor.SecurityContextInterceptor}}.
> This interceptor calls {{org.jboss.as.security.service.SimpleSecurityManager.push}}, which tries to establish a new stacked security context by attempting a login to a JAAS login module associated with the security domain.
> However, when the caller authenticated via a JASPIC auth module, there isn't necessarily such a JAAS login module (the JASPIC auth module is not required to call a JAAS login module, and even if it did it may not be the JAAS login module JBoss knows about).
> The problematic part in {{SimpleSecurityManager}}:
> {code}
> public void push(final String securityDomain, final String runAs, final String runAsPrincipal, final Set<String> extraRoles) {
> boolean contextPushed = false;
> boolean securityContextEstablished = false;
> final SecurityContext previous = SecurityContextAssociation.getSecurityContext();
> try {
> contexts.push(previous);
> contextPushed = true;
> SecurityContext current = establishSecurityContext(securityDomain);
> securityContextEstablished = true;
> if (previous != null) {
> current.setSubjectInfo(previous.getSubjectInfo());
> current.setIncomingRunAs(previous.getOutgoingRunAs());
> }
> RunAs currentRunAs = current.getIncomingRunAs();
> boolean trusted = currentRunAs != null && currentRunAs instanceof RunAsIdentity;
> if (trusted == false) {
>
> boolean authenticated = false;
> if (SecurityActions.remotingContextIsSet()) {
> // ...
> }
> // If we have a trusted identity no need for a re-auth.
> if (authenticated == false) {
> // THIS WILL EVENTUALLY ATTEMPT A JAAS LOGIN WHICH FAILS
> authenticated = authenticate(current, null);
> }
> {code}
> The (condensed) stack that will lead to an exception is the following:
> {noformat}
> javax.security.auth.login.FailedLoginException: PBOX000070: Password invalid/Password required
> org.jboss.security.authentication.JBossCachedAuthenticationManager.defaultLogin(Principal, Object)
> org.jboss.security.authentication.JBossCachedAuthenticationManager.proceedWithJaasLogin(Principal, Object, Subject)
> org.jboss.security.authentication.JBossCachedAuthenticationManager.isValid(Principal, Object, Subject)
> org.jboss.as.security.service.SimpleSecurityManager.authenticate(SecurityContext, Subject)
> org.jboss.as.security.service.SimpleSecurityManager.push(String, String, String, Set<String>)
> org.jboss.as.ejb3.security.SecurityContextInterceptor.SecurityContextInterceptor(SecurityContextInterceptorHolder)
> {noformat}
> Since the {{SimpleSecurityManager}} is already doing a check to see if the call is remote or not, I wonder if it could not simply accept the existing security context as-is for local calls (not even start a new context) or just consider the existing security context as trusted for local calls just like a {{RunAS}} identity.
> Note that this depends on SECURITY-744 and SECURITY-745, since otherwise there is no valid security context at all.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list