[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1474) Activation.getObjectsDeep() should include "exists" elements too

Geoffrey De Smet (JIRA) issues at jboss.org
Sat Mar 11 11:33:00 EST 2017


     [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Geoffrey De Smet updated DROOLS-1474:
-------------------------------------
    Summary: Activation.getObjectsDeep() should include "exists" elements too  (was: Activation.getObjectsDeep() should include exists too)


> Activation.getObjectsDeep() should include "exists" elements too
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DROOLS-1474
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1474
>             Project: Drools
>          Issue Type: Enhancement
>          Components: core engine
>    Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Beta6
>            Reporter: Geoffrey De Smet
>            Assignee: Mario Fusco
>
> _Give them a finger and they'll want a hand. Give them a hand and they'll want an arm._ (dutch proverb)
> The Activation.getObjectDeeps() method introduced for DROOLS-1470 that also includes the accumulates elements, should also include the exists elements. For example:
> {code}
>   when
>     $c : Computer(id = "c1")
>     exists Process(computer == $c)
>   then ...
> {code}
> with this data
> {code}
>   Computer c1;
>   Computer c2;
>   Computer c3;
>   Process pA = new Process(c1);
>   Process pB = new Process(c2);
>   Process pC = new Process(c1);
>   Process pD = new Process(c3);
> {code}
> gives this result
> {code}
>   activation.getObjectsDeep() // includes c1, pA and pC.
> {code}
> The goal is to identify all objects that matched when this rule got fired. In a negative score rule, all those objects are to blame and by focusing to change any of those, it's more likely to improve the overall solution.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)


More information about the jboss-jira mailing list