[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1474) Activation.getObjectsDeep() should include "exists" elements too
Geoffrey De Smet (JIRA)
issues at jboss.org
Sat Mar 11 11:33:00 EST 2017
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Geoffrey De Smet updated DROOLS-1474:
-------------------------------------
Summary: Activation.getObjectsDeep() should include "exists" elements too (was: Activation.getObjectsDeep() should include exists too)
> Activation.getObjectsDeep() should include "exists" elements too
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1474
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1474
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Beta6
> Reporter: Geoffrey De Smet
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
>
> _Give them a finger and they'll want a hand. Give them a hand and they'll want an arm._ (dutch proverb)
> The Activation.getObjectDeeps() method introduced for DROOLS-1470 that also includes the accumulates elements, should also include the exists elements. For example:
> {code}
> when
> $c : Computer(id = "c1")
> exists Process(computer == $c)
> then ...
> {code}
> with this data
> {code}
> Computer c1;
> Computer c2;
> Computer c3;
> Process pA = new Process(c1);
> Process pB = new Process(c2);
> Process pC = new Process(c1);
> Process pD = new Process(c3);
> {code}
> gives this result
> {code}
> activation.getObjectsDeep() // includes c1, pA and pC.
> {code}
> The goal is to identify all objects that matched when this rule got fired. In a negative score rule, all those objects are to blame and by focusing to change any of those, it's more likely to improve the overall solution.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list