[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-8459) @TransactionAttribute should not be inherited per EJB 3.2 spec
Stuart Douglas (JIRA)
issues at jboss.org
Tue Mar 28 18:45:00 EDT 2017
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-8459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Stuart Douglas moved JBEAP-9965 to WFLY-8459:
---------------------------------------------
Project: WildFly (was: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform)
Key: WFLY-8459 (was: JBEAP-9965)
Workflow: GIT Pull Request workflow (was: CDW with loose statuses v1)
Component/s: EJB
(was: EJB)
Affects Version/s: (was: 7.0.4.GA)
> @TransactionAttribute should not be inherited per EJB 3.2 spec
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-8459
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-8459
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB
> Environment: JBoss EA P7.0.x
> Reporter: Stuart Douglas
> Assignee: Stuart Douglas
>
> It appears that JBoss EAP behaves as the *@TransactionAttribute* attribute was inherited.
> For example if I have a bean A that
> {noformat}
> @Stateless
> @TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.REQUIRES_NEW)
> public class ABean extends Base{
>
> public void foo(){ . . .}
> }
> {noformat}
> and a supper class
> {noformat}
> @TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.SUPPORTS)
> public class Base {
>
> @TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.NEVER)
> public void foo(){ . . }
> public void bar(){ . . .}
> }
> {noformat}
> and if I call each method
> {noformat}
> beanA.bar();
> beanA.foo();
> {noformat}
> I would expect to see *bar()* without an active transaction and *foo()* with an active transaction
> but what I see is that both method have no active transaction. This seems like spec violation since the *@TransactionAttribute* are not supposed to be inherited.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list