[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3393) Please review scenario error cell text for legibility/accessibility.

[Liz Clayton (Jira)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13670761#comment-13670761 ] 

Liz Clayton edited comment on DROOLS-3393 at 12/5/18 9:25 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

[~kkufova] I agree. [~bdellasc] Wdyt (this is a pic of the current implementation). I'm realizing that adding an icon to this area might be tricky? 
 !Screen Shot 2018-12-04 at 9.08.37 AM.png|thumbnail! 
I think we could plan to go ahead with the text changes that we're in agreement on and just skip the icon part. Do you all agree?  p.s. [~kkufova] do you know why the cell grid lines are missing in this example? 
Thanks! 



was (Author: uxdlc):
[~kkufova] I agree. [~bdellasc] Wdyt (this is a pic of the current implementation) ^^. I'm realizing that adding an icon to this area might be tricky? 
 !Screen Shot 2018-12-04 at 9.08.37 AM.png|thumbnail! 
I think we could plan to go ahead with the text changes that we're in agreement on and just skip the icon part. Do you all agree?  p.s. [~kkufova] do you know why the cell grid lines are missing in this example? 
Thanks! 


> Please review scenario error cell text for legibility/accessibility. 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DROOLS-3393
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3393
>             Project: Drools
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing
>            Reporter: Liz Clayton
>            Assignee: Klara Kufova
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ScenarioSimulation, UX, UXTeam
>         Attachments: Screen Shot 2018-11-30 at 11.59.32 AM.png, Screen Shot 2018-11-30 at 12.05.50 PM.png, Screen Shot 2018-12-04 at 9.08.37 AM.png, Screenshot from 2018-11-30 17-11-43.png
>
>
> [~kkufova] [~bdellasc]
> I noticed that the error text is a little "fuzzy" looking, the edges aren't very sharp and I was concerned that it might not be legible. I asked Danielle about the specs for it and it's the same size just bolded.  
> I did an online accessibility text using the following tool, with our current hex values: https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/. It failed for level 3 compliance, but I'm not sure we need to shoot for that or not? I tried the darker PatternFly red color "#8b0000" and it passed at all levels, even at smaller sizes. 
> I'm wondering if we could use the darker red, in the non-bolded font? And if so, perhaps the text would be a little bit more legible. 
> Just wanted to ask about this, please let me know what you think.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)