[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2184) UX design DRD logic table actions

[Liz Clayton (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13528715#comment-13528715 ] 

Liz Clayton edited comment on DROOLS-2184 at 2/5/18 4:33 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

[~aglass] Thanks for sending the article that [~srambach] found. I just scanned it but it looks interesting and will read it more carefully when I have a sec. I see the pencil and kebabs in the examples - it looks like they are always there. I'm concerned that having these elements always present will add too much "[chart junk|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartjunk]" to the display and might overwhelm the content. My "where to" question was a bit rhetorical in that I was positing that there might not be a good place to put these widgets. But I could keep knocking this around in future design iterations. 

My gut feeling is that decision tables are a different beast than the PF type data tables, and that we should design for the key decision functions/features and unique use cases for these tables. But I'm new to this DMN area, so I might be off. Adding [~tirelli] [~ibek] [~manstis] for input and for a heads-up that folks might be interested in opening up a jira for another round of iterations. 
Thanks, Liz


was (Author: uxdlc):
[~aglass] Thanks for sending the article that [~srambach] found. I just scanned it but it looks interesting and will read it more carefully when I have a sec. I see the pencil and kebabs in the examples - it looks like they are always there. I'm concerned that having these elements always present will add too much "[chart junk|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartjunk]" to the display and might overwhelm the content. My "where to" question was a bit rhetorical in that I was positing that there might not be a good place to put these widgets. But I could keep knocking this around in future design iterations. 

My gut feeling is that decision tables are a different beast than the PF type data tables, and that we should design for the key decision functions/features and unique use cases for these tables. But I'm new to this DMN area, so I might be off. Adding [~tirelli] [~ibek] [~manstis] for input and for a heads-up that folks might be interested in my opening up a jira for another round of iterations. 
Thanks, Liz

> UX design DRD logic table actions
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DROOLS-2184
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2184
>             Project: Drools
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: DMN Editor
>            Reporter: Liz Clayton
>            Assignee: Liz Clayton
>              Labels: UX, UXTeam
>         Attachments: DMN Editor UX - Logic_ 2184 - Google Docs.pdf, Screen Shot 2018-01-19 at 3.22.15 PM.png, Screen Shot 2018-01-19 at 3.22.25 PM.png, Screen Shot 2018-01-19 at 3.23.31 PM.png, kebab-dmn.png, kebab-where.png
>
>
> Use case description:

 As a business user (Citizen Developer…), I want to easily create, edit, and refine business decision logic (tables, expressions, boxed expression, etc.) Note: Using inline controls and employ autocomplete capabilities where possible.



> Verification Conditions
> * The user of this feature is able to easily/quickly perform key actions (Add, Remove, Edit) in logic tables, boxed expressions, and the like. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)