[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (WFBUILD-34) Use the same groupId:artifactId[:type[:classifier[:version]]] format everywhere

[James Perkins (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFBUILD-34?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13531305#comment-13531305 ] 

James Perkins commented on WFBUILD-34:
--------------------------------------

This introduces an issue where JBoss Modules expects {{groupId:artifactId:version[:classifier]}}.

> Use the same groupId:artifactId[:type[:classifier[:version]]] format everywhere
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WFBUILD-34
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFBUILD-34
>             Project: WildFly Build Tools
>          Issue Type: Enhancement
>            Reporter: Peter Palaga
>            Assignee: Stuart Douglas
>             Fix For: 1.2.8.Final
>
>
> This both a usability issue and a feature request.
> On the usability side, the artifact formats in module.xml files vs. in feature-pack-build.xml files are not the same:
> * `{{groupId:artifactId\[:version\[:classifier]]}}` in module.xml files
> * `{{groupId:artifactId\[:type\[:classifier]]}}` in feature-pack-build.xml files
> The missing feature is the impossibility to define type/extension in module.xml files and the impossibility to had code version in  feature-pack-build.xml files
> The current proposal is to use the same {{groupId:artifactId\[:type\[:classifier\[:version]]]}} format in both kinds of files.
> The proposal is backwards incompatible for module.xml files. But given that the support for hardcoded versions in module.xml files was added just 11 days ago, this will probably impact just a few users.
> I am not sure what artifact format is used by JBoss modules. Maybe `{{groupId:artifactId\[:version\[:classifier]]}}` is taken from there?
> WDYT [~swd847]?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)