[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3928) Exclusion groupId and artifactId in the wrong order in the root pom
Kabir Khan (JIRA)
issues at jboss.org
Thu Jun 14 04:15:00 EDT 2018
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Kabir Khan moved WFLY-10572 to WFCORE-3928:
-------------------------------------------
Project: WildFly Core (was: WildFly)
Key: WFCORE-3928 (was: WFLY-10572)
Component/s: Build System
(was: Build System)
Affects Version/s: 5.0.0.Final
(was: 13.0.0.Final)
Fix Version/s: 6.0.0.Alpha2
(was: 14.0.0.CR1)
> Exclusion groupId and artifactId in the wrong order in the root pom
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3928
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3928
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Build System
> Affects Versions: 5.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Kabir Khan
> Assignee: Kabir Khan
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 6.0.0.Alpha2
>
>
> e.g. in https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/13.0.0.Final/pom.xml#L4198 the exclusions have groupId and artifactId in the wrong order. e.g.
> {code}
> <exclusion>
> <artifactId>hal-ballroom</artifactId>
> <groupId>org.jboss.hal</groupId>
> </exclusion>
> {code}
> should be
> {code}
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>org.jboss.hal</groupId>
> <artifactId>hal-ballroom</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> {code}
> While the former is valid, it is confusing, and seems to have been introduced in the refactoring to use the component-matrix (which was later undone)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list