[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-10392) Regression in Remote JCA scenario with JDBC store after Artemis upgrade

[Francesco Nigro (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13579227#comment-13579227 ] 

Francesco Nigro edited comment on WFLY-10392 at 5/19/18 4:31 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

[~eduda] [~jmesnil] I have manually checked the SQL statements related to Oracle before and after the introduction of the property based configuration:
 !image-2018-05-19-10-26-05-662.png|thumbnail!  

I can't spot meaningful differences TBH, [~jmesnil] wdyt?
So, given that:
* the SQL doesn't seem to have been changed
* I have reverted any bits of JDBC HA that could impact the original behaviour (on tables creation and specific SQL statements)

There are very few options left:
# the issue could be related to any other remaining commits that seems unrelated
# the env where the tests are running has something wrong

I'm checking if there is anything related to the former, would be great to do the same for the latter.


was (Author: fnigro):
[~eduda] [~jmesnil] I have manually checked the SQL statements related to Oracle before and after the introduction of the property based configuration:
 !image-2018-05-19-10-26-05-662.png|thumbnail!  

I can't spot meaningful differences TBH, [~jmesnil] wdyt?
So, given that:
* the SQL doesn't seem to have been changed
* I have reverted any bits of JDBC HA that could impact the original behaviour (on tables creation and specific SQL statements)

There are very few options left:
# the issue could be related to any other remaining commits that seems unrelated
# the env where the tests are running has something wrong

I'm checking if there is anything related to the former, would be great to do the same for the latter.

> Regression in Remote JCA scenario with JDBC store after Artemis upgrade
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WFLY-10392
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10392
>             Project: WildFly
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JMS
>            Reporter: Erich Duda
>            Assignee: Jeff Mesnil
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: image-2018-05-19-10-26-05-662.png, sql-diff.png
>
>
> After Artemis upgrade to 1.5.5.jbossorg-011 (WFLY-10139) I can see a regression in Remote JCA test case when JDBC persistent store is used. This issue is not present if Artemis file based journal is used.
> When I removed commits related to JDBC HA from Artemis upgrade, the test passed with both JDBC and file based store.
> *Remote JCA scenario:*
> * There are 4 Wildfly servers
> * Servers 1 and 3 are used as messaging brokers - they are called JMS servers
> * Servers 2 and 4 have MDBs and RA configured to connect to JMS servers. These servers are called MDB servers.
> * External standalone producer sends messages to server 1 to InQueue
> * MDBs on MBD severs receive messages from InQueue and send them to OutQueue
> * External standalone receiver receives messages from server 3 from OutQueue
> * During this scenario server 1 is several times killed and restarted.
> *Expectation:* All messages sent by the standalone producer are received by the standalone receiver. There are no lost or duplicated messages.
> *Reality:* After some kills of server 1, message flow coming from the standalone producer is broken and the receiver does not receive any messages in specified timeout.
> *Critical* priority was chosen because the regression has been detected only in this particular test case so far. We ran only nightly testing scope. After that we run full testing, we will know more about impact of this issue.
> *Technical details:*
> At some point following log messages start to occur in the test log. It seems that they are related to malfunction of communication among Artemis brokers what causes that message flow is broken.
> {code}
> 21:55:51,724 WARN  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server] (Thread-1 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)) AMQ222139: MessageFlowRecordImpl [nodeID=e53da514-5953-11e8-910a-fa163e48a89a, connector=TransportConfigur
> ation(name=connector, factory=org-apache-activemq-artemis-core-remoting-impl-netty-NettyConnectorFactory) ?httpUpgradeEndpoint=acceptor&activemqServerName=default&httpUpgradeEnabled=true&port=10080&host=rhel7-la
> rge-58597, queueName=sf.my-cluster.e53da514-5953-11e8-910a-fa163e48a89a, queue=QueueImpl[name=sf.my-cluster.e53da514-5953-11e8-910a-fa163e48a89a, postOffice=PostOfficeImpl [server=ActiveMQServerImpl::serverUUID=
> d80bf5bd-5953-11e8-ac10-fa163e48a89a]]@756a727a, isClosed=false, reset=true]::Remote queue binding jms.queue.DLQe53da514-5953-11e8-910a-fa163e48a89a has already been bound in the post office. Most likely cause f
> or this is you have a loop in your cluster due to cluster max-hops being too large or you have multiple cluster connections to the same nodes using overlapping addresses
> {code}
> {code}
> 21:55:53,078 ERROR [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server] (Thread-6 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)) AMQ224037: cluster connection Failed to handle message: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot find binding for jms.queue.InQueuee53da514-5953-11e8-910a-fa163e48a89a on ClusterConnectionImpl at 14989488[nodeUUID=d80bf5bd-5953-11e8-ac10-fa163e48a89a, connector=TransportConfiguration(name=connector, factory=org-apache-activemq-artemis-core-remoting-impl-netty-NettyConnectorFactory) ?httpUpgradeEndpoint=acceptor&activemqServerName=default&httpUpgradeEnabled=true&port=8080&host=rhel7-large-58597, address=jms, server=ActiveMQServerImpl::serverUUID=d80bf5bd-5953-11e8-ac10-fa163e48a89a]
>         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.cluster.impl.ClusterConnectionImpl$MessageFlowRecordImpl.doConsumerCreated(ClusterConnectionImpl.java:1294) [artemis-server-1.5.5.jbossorg-011.jar:1.5.5.jbossorg-011]
>         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.cluster.impl.ClusterConnectionImpl$MessageFlowRecordImpl.handleNotificationMessage(ClusterConnectionImpl.java:1029) [artemis-server-1.5.5.jbossorg-011.jar:1.5.5.jbossorg-011]
>         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.cluster.impl.ClusterConnectionImpl$MessageFlowRecordImpl.onMessage(ClusterConnectionImpl.java:1004) [artemis-server-1.5.5.jbossorg-011.jar:1.5.5.jbossorg-011]
>         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientConsumerImpl.callOnMessage(ClientConsumerImpl.java:1001) [artemis-core-client-1.5.5.jbossorg-011.jar:1.5.5.jbossorg-011]
>         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientConsumerImpl.access$400(ClientConsumerImpl.java:49) [artemis-core-client-1.5.5.jbossorg-011.jar:1.5.5.jbossorg-011]
>         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientConsumerImpl$Runner.run(ClientConsumerImpl.java:1124) [artemis-core-client-1.5.5.jbossorg-011.jar:1.5.5.jbossorg-011]
>         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.OrderedExecutorFactory$OrderedExecutor$ExecutorTask.run(OrderedExecutorFactory.java:122) [artemis-commons-1.5.5.jbossorg-011.jar:1.5.5.jbossorg-011]
>         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) [rt.jar:1.8.0_171]
>         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) [rt.jar:1.8.0_171]
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [rt.jar:1.8.0_171]
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)