[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (JBREM-1340) Memory leak related to org.jboss.threads.JBossThreadFactory

[David Lloyd (Jira)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBREM-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13715607#comment-13715607 ] 

David Lloyd commented on JBREM-1340:
------------------------------------

I think the problem is unbounded thread creation in the old JBoss management client.  It really seems like a problem that was fixed years ago.  You would need to upgrade your client library and configure it to connect via {{remote}} to be compatible with the old server you're using.

> Memory leak related to org.jboss.threads.JBossThreadFactory
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBREM-1340
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBREM-1340
>             Project: JBoss Remoting
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jmx remoting
>            Reporter: Adrián López
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: img-2019-04-01-130952.png, lep2jia1-heapdump-1554113927775_Leak_Suspects.zip
>
>
> We have a memory leak when using the jboss-cli-client JAR inside of Jolokia.
> Jolokia uses remoting to connect to the JMX of several JBoss servers. After running for some days, the Old Gen memory space reach 100%.
> A heap dump analyzed with Eclipse MAT returns:
> {code}
> One instance of "java.lang.ThreadGroup" loaded by "<system class loader>" occupies 377.517.248 (87,28%) bytes. The instance is referenced by org.jboss.threads.JBossThread @ 0xe0a81ef0 HTTP-11 , loaded by "org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader @ 0xe04ffe20". The memory is accumulated in one instance of "java.lang.ThreadGroup[]" loaded by "<system class loader>".
> The stacktrace of this Thread is available. See stacktrace.
> Keywords
> java.lang.ThreadGroup[]
> org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader @ 0xe04ffe20
> java.lang.ThreadGroup
> {code}
> Thread stack
> {code}
> HTTP-11
>   at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(ZJ)V (Native Method)
>   at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(Ljava/lang/Object;)V (LockSupport.java:186)
>   at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await()V (AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2043)
>   at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take()Ljava/lang/Object; (LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)
>   at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask()Ljava/lang/Runnable; (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1068)
>   at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Ljava/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker;)V (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1130)
>   at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run()V (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run()V (Thread.java:745)
>   at org.jboss.threads.JBossThread.run()V (JBossThread.java:122)
> {code}
> I have created also another [issue|https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTHR-72] to jboss-threads, but looks the problem is not there.
> Same for [Jolokia|https://github.com/rhuss/jolokia/issues/401]
> Thanks



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)