[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2299) LockService does not work correctly if unlock/lock is called in immediate succession
David White (Jira)
issues at jboss.org
Mon Apr 29 09:04:00 EDT 2019
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13727639#comment-13727639 ]
David White commented on JGRP-2299:
-----------------------------------
In my case we are using TCP, not UDP.
> LockService does not work correctly if unlock/lock is called in immediate succession
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-2299
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2299
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.0.15
> Environment: Windows 10 Oracle JDK 1.8 131
> AIX IBM Java 8
> Reporter: Mirko Streckenbach
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.1.1
>
> Attachments: JGroupsExample.java, udp+lock.xml
>
>
> In our application we have encountered occasional cases of LockService allowing 2 processes to hold the same lock at the same time. I could reproduce this with a simple program (see atttachment) and it happens if for a lock "unlock" is called and immediately afterwards "lock". If there is a small delay (e.g. 1 second) between the two operations everything works as expected.
> This can be produced with the attached program. The program does lock/unlock/lock on a lock and then tries to lock the same lock from a different JChannel and is awarded the lock. If you place a small sleep() after the unlock, everything works as expected and the parallel lock is not awarded.
> If you turn on debugging you'll see no output between unlock and lock, so it looks to me like the lock is awarded without passing GRANT_LOCK messages to the stack. Using a conditional break point you can see that ClientLock.acquired is still true even after the unlock().
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list