[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3482) Terminology for DMN import

[Stetson Robinson (Jira)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13689168#comment-13689168 ] 

Stetson Robinson commented on DROOLS-3482:
------------------------------------------

[~tirelli], [~uxdlc], I see. Would we cover our bases better if we said *Included DMN artifacts* or *Included artifacts*?

* Tab and page header: *Included DMN artifacts* / *Included artifacts*
* Description: *Included DMN artifacts are externally defined DMN models or other DMN-related artifacts that have been added to this DMN file so that its decision requirements diagram or graph components are available to this DMN file.*

Still not in love with the description wording, but would that general idea work? Would *assets* be better than *artifacts*? I hesitate to say "assets" because that's what we use in the general project import screen.

> Terminology for DMN import
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: DROOLS-3482
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3482
>             Project: Drools
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: DMN Editor
>            Reporter: Liz Clayton
>            Assignee: Stetson Robinson
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: drools-tools
>
> Define best term to use for importing a DMN file, from the project directory. Importing a .dmn file will include file nodes, data types, etc. The term will be used for a tab label, button labels, and the like. 
> UX mockups currently use "import" but other terms such as "include" have been discussed. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)