[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5268) [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope

[Guilherme Gomes (Jira)]

     [ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Guilherme Gomes updated DROOLS-5268:
------------------------------------
    Description: 
In a DRG such as:
 !image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png|thumbnail! 

the smartcomplete is suggesting symbols not in scope of the specific DRGElement:
 !image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png|thumbnail! 

in my perspective this is quite dangerous, as it could very easily lead the user to write a wrong FEEL expression.

Please consider suggesting only "variables" in scope of the DRG/DRGElement

  was:
In a DRG such as:
 !image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png|thumbnail! 

the smartcomplete is suggesting symbols not in scope of the specific DRGElement:
 !image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png|thumbnail! 

in my perspective this is quite dangerous, as it could very easily lead the user to write a wrong FEEL expression.

1. Please consider suggesting only "variables" in scope of the DRG/DRGElement
2. Please consider if suggesting types is really necessary



> [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DROOLS-5268
>                 URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268
>             Project: Drools
>          Issue Type: Enhancement
>          Components: DMN Editor
>    Affects Versions: 7.37.0.Final
>            Reporter: Matteo Mortari
>            Assignee: Guilherme Gomes
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: drools-tools
>         Attachments: image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png, image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png
>
>
> In a DRG such as:
>  !image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png|thumbnail! 
> the smartcomplete is suggesting symbols not in scope of the specific DRGElement:
>  !image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png|thumbnail! 
> in my perspective this is quite dangerous, as it could very easily lead the user to write a wrong FEEL expression.
> Please consider suggesting only "variables" in scope of the DRG/DRGElement



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)