[jboss-l10n] JBoss Tools L10n - help wanted!

Thomas Heute theute at redhat.com
Fri May 8 06:30:13 EDT 2009


Sean,

 From what i've gathered:
	- PO is good for editing
	- .properties are good for programming (faster from what i heard and 
less verbose)

I see that you've build a Properties to PO tool, but how do you go back 
to properties ? I'm not sure if you've built a tool to migrate or to be 
used back and forth (bi-directional).

I'm definitely interested by such tools for JBoss Portal.

Thomas


Sean Flanigan wrote:
> G'day,
> 
> I've been working on some translation infrastructure for JBoss Tools.
> 
> I'm pleased to report that we've already got some Japanese translations
> for JBoss Tools, courtesy of a contribution by Shinobu Nogami.  Any help
> with reviewing, correcting, or completing these translations would be
> appreciated!  Translations for other languages would be great too.
> 
> My build scripts for jbosstools-l10n use Tennera Ant-Gettext to convert
> between .properties files (ResourceBundles) in the Java source code and
> Gettext PO/POT files.  A bit like Translate Toolkit's prop2po but with
> one important difference: an entire directory tree of properties files
> can be reduced to a single POT file (not a tree of POT files).
> 
> I hope this will make life easier for translators, since dealing with
> hundreds of .properties files is hard enough in a good developer's IDE.
>  From what I've seen, the open source translation editors just aren't
> that good at dealing with lots of small files efficiently.  I'm not
> familiar with any commercial translation tools, but I don't think many
> of them would edit .properties files directly - they would convert to
> another file format, or a database).
> 
> PO files have their flaws, but they're still a big improvement over
> .properties for L10n purposes, and they are what the Red Hat L10n team
> mostly uses in current translation workflows (as I understand it).
> 
> Anyway, the POT templates for JBoss Tools 3.1, and also the Japanese PO
> files, are currently living in a Mercurial repository here:
> http://bitbucket.org/seanf/jbosstools-l10n/ (Obviously, that's not meant
> to be the permanent location!  And I'm not married to Mercurial, though
> having a DVCS would be nice.)
> 
> Ultimately, I suggest these particular translations should probably live
> somewhere like this:
> http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jboss-l10n/jbosstools/3.1 [or maybe
> .../trunk]
> 
> But where to host them is the subject of my other post...
> 
> Sean.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-l10n mailing list
> jboss-l10n at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-l10n




More information about the jboss-l10n mailing list