[jboss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Re: SLSB Local Interface Exception - EjB 3.0 with jboss-4.0.

[vashistvishal]

Let me get my understanding here correct
My understanding is .....

Remote is when client calls from a different JVM environment to a Bean which is 
in a seperate JVM. This is where Calls By Value comes in as everything has to be 
copied (part of serailization) to be sent across the wire.  

Where as Local means when both Client and Beans are in same JVM which means 
Call by reference is used.
You can enlighten me please if this is wrong or nor correct.

As to this error i thought i could change the setting in 
conf/standrdjboss.xml file where  invoker proxy binding 
settings are.


  | 
  | <invoker-proxy-binding>
  |       <name>entity-rmi-invoker</name>
  |       <invoker-mbean>jboss:service=invoker,type=jrmp</invoker-mbean>
  |       <proxy-factory>org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory</proxy-factory>
  |       <proxy-factory-config>
  |         <client-interceptors>
  |           <home>
  |             <interceptor>org.jboss.proxy.ejb.HomeInterceptor</interceptor>
  |             <interceptor>org.jboss.proxy.SecurityInterceptor</interceptor>
  |             <interceptor>org.jboss.proxy.TransactionInterceptor</interceptor>
  |  <interceptor call-by-value="false">org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor</interceptor>
  | <interceptor call-by-value="true">org.jboss.invocation.MarshallingInvokerInterceptor</interceptor>
  | </home>
  | -----
  | and some for others as in this category
  | 
  | -----
  |   </client-interceptors>
  |       </proxy-factory-config>
  |  </invoker-proxy-binding>
  | 
  | 

I'm not sure in this version of JBoss which option to modify yet as 
currenty InvokerInterceptor is set to call by value, where as if i go by 
my understanding than if i change it to false than it should work as my 
client for both Remote and  Local are in same JVM. 

Vishal



View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3972807#3972807

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3972807