[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: @In with configurable component name - is it possible?

[petemuir]

"ASavitsky" wrote : My main concern with your approach is that the whole @In semantics gets lost from the parent class, even though it clearly belongs there.

I'm not convinced of this, can you tell me why?

anonymous wrote : 
  |   | @Override (
  |   |     property = "foo",
  |   |     overrides = {
  |   |         @In ("specificFoo")
  |   |     })
  |   | public class Child {
  |   | }

I think this complicates the component and the syntax far more than any benefit it gives.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040703#4040703

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040703