[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Declaring session beans in ejb-jar.xml
persabi
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Wed Feb 28 02:53:42 EST 2007
In the case where there exists an abstract base class with member level annotations and an inheriting subclass SFSB, a basic Seam app works fine where the @Stateful annotation exists in the inheriting subclass. In this case, the jboss logs show:
| Component: register, scope: EVENT, type: STATEFUL_SESSION_BEAN, class: org.test.hotelbooking.RegisterActionBean, JNDI: booking-seam-1.0-SNAPSHOT/RegisterActionBean/local
|
However, say instead of specifying the @Stateful annotation on the SFSB subclass, I define the session bean in the ejb-jar.xml like so:
| <session>
| <description>Register Action Bean</description>
| <ejb-name>RegisterActionBean</ejb-name>
| <local>org.test.hotelbooking.RegisterActionLocal</local>
| <ejb-class>org.test.hotelbooking.RegisterActionBean</ejb-class>
| <session-type>Stateful</session-type>
| <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
| </session>
|
the bean is not registered as a SFSB Seam component, rather a javabean Seam component.
| Component: register, scope: EVENT, type: JAVA_BEAN, class: org.test.hotelbooking.RegisterActionBean, JNDI: booking-seam-1.0-SNAPSHOT/RegisterActionBean/local
|
Bear in mind, instead of specifying the @Name and @Scope annotations on the bean (subclass), we define them in components.xml like so:
| <component
| name="register"
| class="org.test.hotelbooking.RegisterActionBean"
| scope="event"
| jndi-name="booking-seam-1.0-SNAPSHOT/RegisterActionBean/local"/>
|
Any ideas how we can define these beans as SFSB rather than javabeans and avoid using the @Stateful in the bean subclass?
Thanks
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4023512#4023512
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4023512
More information about the jboss-user
mailing list