[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Is it good to code JSP-specific information in EJB??
jazir1979
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Sun May 20 18:53:54 EDT 2007
Hi Alain,
I think that should work using the @DataModelSelection annotation to inject the selected row.
I guess our experiences are different, because I've rarely used existing EJB services written "years before" for a new UI. But as I said, it's easy to keep this separation, so what is the big deal with having UI concerns in your Seam EJBs?
If you use RichFaces, being able to inject a UI component and manipulate it based on an AJAX-initiated action can be very handy: @In(required = false, value = "#{uiComponent['panel']}") private UIPanel richPanel;
Daniel.
"hsiung" wrote : hi Daniel,
|
| I'm not sure I understand your point. In a matter of facts, actually in most cases I know of, the EJB services are settled. New web applications running on a web container use EJB services already written years before. It would be complicating the architecture to introduce UI concerns in a service layer that is per definition a UI neutral layer. Yes, separating UI concerns from the service layer is a true requirement.
|
| I was refering to Pete's statement
| anonymous wrote : [the tree case] is really the only case when I have to put UI in a component.
| As I understand his statement, SelectOneRadio (which is NOT a tree) works without putting UI concerns in the EJB layer. I'm sure he is correct. So I simply ask how do SelectOneRadio works without ValueChangeEvent in the EJB, assuming we remove the backing bean in the web container with Seam.
|
| Alain
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4047080#4047080
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4047080
More information about the jboss-user
mailing list