[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - RuleBasedIdentity vs CustomLdapIdentity - is it a bug

[PatrickMadden]

Hi,

Rule based identity is defined as follows:


  | @Name("org.jboss.seam.security.identity")
  | @Scope(SESSION)
  | @BypassInterceptors
  | @Install(precedence=FRAMEWORK, classDependencies="org.drools.WorkingMemory")
  | @Startup
  | public class RuleBasedIdentity extends Identity{...
  | 

I want to define a new class as follows:


  | @Name("org.jboss.seam.security.identity")
  | @Scope(SESSION)
  | @BypassInterceptors
  | 
  | // if com.foo.security.ldap.ActiveDirectorySupport is in the path 
  | // then we are using active directory. It should be a mini jar file put in
  | // the path via the installer.
  | 
  | @Install(precedence=FRAMEWORK, 
  | 		classDependencies="com.foo.security.ldap.ActiveDirectorySupport")
  | @Startup
  | public class ActiveDirectoryIdentity extends Identity{
  | 

However, when I do so I get errors like this:


  | jvm 1    | SEVERE: Exception sending context initialized event to listener instance of class org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamListener
  | jvm 1    | java.lang.IllegalStateException: Two components with the same name and precedence: org.jboss.seam.security.identity
  | jvm 1    |      at org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.addComponentDescriptor(Initialization.java:456)
  | jvm 1    |      at org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.installScannedComponentAndRoles(Initialization.java:739)
  | jvm 1    |      at org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.scanForComponents(Initialization.java:683)
  | jvm 1    |      at org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.init(Initialization.java:536)
  | jvm 1    |      at org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamListener.contextInitialized(SeamListener.java:34)
  | jvm 1    |      at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart(StandardContext.java:3830)
  | jvm 1    |      at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4337)
  | jvm 1    |      at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1045)
  | jvm 1    |      at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(StandardHost.java:719)
  | jvm 1    |      at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1045)
  | jvm 1    |      at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(StandardEngine.java:443)
  | jvm 1    |      at org.apache.catalina.startup.Embedded.start(Embedded.java:825)
  | jvm 1    |      at com.foo.bar.tomcat.EmbeddedTomcat.startTomcat(EmbeddedTomcat.java:238)
  | 

Is this a bug or as designed?

The reason I want to do this is because when I step in the debugger watching Microsoft Active Directory JAAS the roles are not that simple. I wanted to be able to catch and inspect them and possibly massage them.

Either way, shouldn't the classDependencies be part of the unique key?

Thanks in advance.

PVM

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105371#4105371

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4105371