[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Difference in an @Asynchronous method
wiberto
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Mon Oct 8 02:49:29 EDT 2007
I'm seeing a weird situation that I really don't understand. I don't think it's really a Seam issue, but maybe someone can help me understand what's going on.
I have an XFire based web service client that lives in my EJB project. I call that web service code from my authenticator class and it works like a charm.
Now I have an asynchronous method using quartz (@Asynchornous) and when that method tries to call the same web service with the same arguments I get the following error:
| Caused by: javax.xml.bind.JAXBException: "com.x.webservices.securityclient" doesnt contain ObjectFactory.class or jaxb.index
| at com.sun.xml.bind.v2.ContextFactory.createContext(ContextFactory.java:119)
| at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
| at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
| at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
| at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
| at javax.xml.bind.ContextFinder.newInstance(ContextFinder.java:132)
| at javax.xml.bind.ContextFinder.find(ContextFinder.java:286)
| at javax.xml.bind.JAXBContext.newInstance(JAXBContext.java:372)
| at javax.xml.bind.JAXBContext.newInstance(JAXBContext.java:337)
| at javax.xml.bind.JAXBContext.newInstance(JAXBContext.java:244)
| at org.codehaus.xfire.jaxb2.JaxbType.getJAXBContext(JaxbType.java:306)
| at org.codehaus.xfire.jaxb2.JaxbType.writeObject(JaxbType.java:230)
|
I tried chaging the async method to stateless from stateful as well as making the dispatcher method a JavaBean instead of a SFSB, but I get the same result. I also tried adding the jaxb.index file it mentioned and the same thing. The ObjectFactory class is there, and I can instantiate it manually, so I know it's in the classpath.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jose
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4092404#4092404
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4092404
More information about the jboss-user
mailing list