[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: Stress Tests
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Tue Aug 5 05:13:32 EDT 2008
"lovelyliatroim" wrote : anonymous wrote :
| | While you may not have the time to play with this, I would advise to at least keep it on your radar. It is _significantly_ faster than 2.X, and has a smaller memory footprint as well. I expect to release Alpha2 this evening/tomorrow morning, and my goal is to have this in GA by the end of September.
| So soon, will keep it on the radar so, how hard/easy would a migration step up be from 2.x to 3.0?? Roughly?
Easier than the 1.x -> 2.x move, I expect. The only real API differences that may cause problems:
1. De-generification of Fqn
2. Removed deprecated public constructors on Fqn - only use static factory methods like Fqn.fromString() from now on.
3. Removed deprecated DefaultCacheFactory.getInstance() method - now create one using "new".
Apart from that, the only other changes are internal so while they will affect you (better performance, lower memory usage, different tuning and config options) they won't affect any interfacing code.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4168674#4168674
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4168674
More information about the jboss-user