[jboss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: Autoexplosion of archives

[bob.mcwhirter]

"alesj" wrote : 
  | There might not be the modification type you're looking for.
  | But it's easy to add what ever you want. ;-)
  | 

Yah, I looked at that too.  Though, that requires extending the ModificationType enumeration and registering a ModificationAction.  Non-trivial to try out a different ModificationAction, it would seem.

Perhaps a ModificationType.ATTACHED and go looking for a ModificationAction.class attachment if set?

"alesj" wrote : 
  | And I also see types behave as I expected. :-)
  | 

Yah, I think they all work as expected, just not a complete set from my POV.  I did see some examples with an UNPACK on the root, but that seems to be non-tenable.  UNPACK only works on child context-infos from the look of it.  Else, the isNested() check stops it on the root without doing anything if you point it at the root deployed archive, not a nested archive.

"alesj" wrote : 
  | You're welcome to impl "top" == 'I effectively want is just a top-level un-jarring'.
  | And I'll add it to VFS 2.0.1. ;-)

I'll poke around, but I should be able to tell the difference between foo.jar as a real directory and foo.jar as a mounted vfszip?  I can still do a byte-for-byte copy of a vfszip-mounted JAR?

I'll work on an implementation.

Thanks!

-Bob

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4193896#4193896

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4193896