[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: nulpointer in slightly complicated process

jjrs do-not-reply at jboss.com
Fri Dec 19 07:37:30 EST 2008

 Hi Ronald,

  I am slightly confused about what when a processdefinition is illegal.  

anonymous wrote :  not all legs of the fork arrive in the same corresponding join. 

 From the functional and dependency point of view, not always be possible to add intermediate fork and joins without affecting the dependencies.

  Is it possible to define a dependency graph like this one using parallel processing ?


 Right with my current settings it's impossible for me to execute Node5. We have been able to get rid of the SOE exceptions (we will explain how in the other thread) however,  with a graph like this, we are not able to execute Node 5.

  Is there any other mechanism we could use for having such a dependency ?

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4197613#4197613

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4197613

More information about the jboss-user mailing list