[jboss-user] [Installation, Configuration & DEPLOYMENT] - Re: Configuring dependencies in Services
Marcelo.S_
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Fri Jul 4 08:13:12 EDT 2008
"jaikiran" wrote : "zithuba" wrote : Yes, There is another topic dealing with this deployment problem, where a DS is deployed after the dependent ear or war.
| | http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162523#4162523
|
| Probably not :)
|
| Marcelo.S_ is using JBoss-4.2.2 GA and not JBoss-5.0 CR1. From what i know, the datasource dependencies work fine in 4.2.2 GA. We just have to figure out the correct "depends" value to use.
|
Was just taking a look at those topics:
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=138587
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=138584
It might not be the same cause, however it made me take a look at \server\default\conf\jboss-service.xml:
<!-- The URLComparator can be used to specify a deployment ordering
| for deployments found in a scanned directory. The class specified
| must be an implementation of java.util.Comparator, it must be able
| to compare two URL objects, and it must have a no-arg constructor.
| Two deployment comparators are shipped with JBoss:
| - org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentSorter
| Sorts by file extension, as follows:
| "sar", "service.xml", "rar", "jar", "war", "wsr", "ear", "zip",
| "*"
| - org.jboss.deployment.scanner.PrefixDeploymentSorter
| If the name portion of the url begins with 1 or more digits, those
| digits are converted to an int (ignoring leading zeroes), and
| files are deployed in that order. Files that do not start with
| any digits will be deployed first, and they will be sorted by
| extension as above with DeploymentSorter.
| -->
| <attribute name="URLComparator">org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentSorter</attribute>
|
| <!--
| <attribute name="URLComparator">org.jboss.deployment.scanner.PrefixDeploymentSorter</attribute>
| -->
|
Just renamed hibernate-service.sar to hibernate-service.jar and it worked as a charm. I'm still curious thought, since the dependencies should work and renaming isn't really the best alternative.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162540#4162540
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162540
More information about the jboss-user
mailing list