[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: job executor explained in a nutshell
kadlecp
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Wed Jun 18 06:20:14 EDT 2008
Hello,
I was thinking about REPEATABLE_READ isolation level with optimistic locking and it seems to me that it can not work. In docs there is written that
anonymous wrote : Non-Repeatable reads are a problem for optimistic locking and therefore isolation level READ_COMMITTED is not enough cause it allows for Non-Repeatable reads to occur. So REPEATABLE_READ is required if you configure more than one job executor thread.
|
But I found here http://www.avaje.org/occ.html that
anonymous wrote : It is important to note that Optimistic Concurrency Checking only works in READ_COMMITED Transaction Isolation Level. Specifically, at higher Isolation levels such as SERIALIZABLE the UPDATE or DELETE will see the database as at the Transaction start time. In the time gap between Transaction start time and the UPDATE/DELETE statement there could be commited changes that will be lost (Lost Updates).
I think b.) is right, it makes sense.
jBPM docs are not correct, am I right? Your docs confused me.
Pavel
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4158934#4158934
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4158934
More information about the jboss-user
mailing list