[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: putForExternalRead doesn't solve our problem

jshowalter do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu Mar 26 20:07:31 EDT 2009


"That should prevent phantom reads, shouldn't it?" -- Sorry, I meant dirty reads. The way we're using the cache makes phantom reads not a problem. And read committed prevents dirty reads. So I think we're in good shape--I have a single-data-item-per-node version of the cache up and running now and am in the process of testing it.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4221438#4221438

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4221438



More information about the jboss-user mailing list