[jboss-user] [Installation, Configuration & Deployment] - Re: AS 5.1.0.GA fails to parse Spring schemas, on AS 4.2.3.G

[nesyarug]

By the process of elimination I've now narrowed it down to a specific file, but can't for the life of me figure out what could be wrong.

The problematic file is my Hibernate/DAO configuration applicationContext-hibernate.xml. Strange however that it seems to fail with the "White spaces" error on the XSD for the first non-default namespace in the XML file.

Here is my "beans" tag:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
  | <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
  | 	   xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"
  | 	   xmlns:tx="http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx"
  | 	   xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
  | 	   					   http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.5.xsd
  | 	   					   http://www.springframework.org/schema/context
  | 	   					   http://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context-2.5.xsd
  | 	   					   http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx
  | 	   					   http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx/spring-tx-2.5.xsd">

When the first non-default namespace tag starts with "<context:", in my case:

<context:annotation-config />

the error is:

Caused by: org.jboss.xb.binding.JBossXBException: Failed to parse source: Failed to parse schema for nsURI=http://www.springframework.org/schema/context, baseURI=null, schemaLocation=null

When I remove that line so that the first non-default namespace tag starts with "<tx:", in my case:

<tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager="transactionManager" />

the error is:

Caused by: org.jboss.xb.binding.JBossXBException: Failed to parse source: Failed to parse schema for nsURI=http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx, baseURI=null, schemaLocation=null

Does that make sense to anyone?

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265145#4265145

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265145