[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging Users] - Performance issues after switching from mq to jboss messagin

[luuzz]

For few days now, i'm working on switching from mq to jboss messaging on jboss 4.2.0. I successfully started the server with jboss messaging without any errors and messages are processed by the mdbs.
So yesterday we did the same in the production environment but unfortunately customers are complaining that the web application is too slow although it was early in the morning with not much activity.
When we switched back to mq everything worked fine. Seems like the problem is messaging. we cheched that all the connections are closed normally. I noticed that we get many logs like that 


  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,722 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.Client] starting callback Connector: InvokerLocator [bisocket://84.246.229.70:1724524841/callback?serverSocketClass=org.jboss.jms.server.remoting.ServerSocketWrapper&isCallbackServer=true&callbackServerProtocol=bisocket&datatype=jms&guid=2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7m-6we&callbackServerHost=84.246.229.70&callbackServerPort=1724524841&clientMaxPoolSize=1&onewayThreadPool=org.jboss.jms.server.remoting.DirectThreadPool&clientSocketClass=org.jboss.jms.client.remoting.ClientSocketWrapper]
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,722 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.transport.bisocket.BisocketServerInvoker] SocketServerInvoker[UNINITIALIZED] setting pingFrequency to 214748364
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,722 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.transport.bisocket.BisocketServerInvoker] SocketServerInvoker[UNINITIALIZED] setting pingWindowFactor to 10
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,724 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.ServerInvoker] SocketServerInvoker[UNINITIALIZED] did not find server socket factory configuration as mbean service or classname. Creating default server socket factory.
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,724 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.ServerInvoker] SocketServerInvoker[UNINITIALIZED] created server socket factory javax.net.DefaultServerSocketFactory at 10efd7c
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,724 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.transport.Connector] org.jboss.remoting.transport.Connector at ce79ab started
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,724 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.ServerInvoker] ServerInvoker (SocketServerInvoker[UNINITIALIZED]) added client callback handler CallbackManager[1ced81d] with session id of 2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7m-6wc+2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7o-6wf and callback handle object of null.
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,724 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.InvokerRegistry] removed org.jboss.remoting.transport.local.LocalClientInvoker at 196046f from registry
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,724 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.callback.ServerInvokerCallbackHandler] Session id for callback handler is 2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7m-6wc+2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7o-6wf
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,724 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.callback.ServerInvokerCallbackHandler] ServerInvokerCallbackHandler[2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7m-6wc+2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7o-6wf] using callbackTimeout value 10000
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,724 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.callback.DefaultCallbackErrorHandler] DefaultCallbackErrorHandler[UNITIALIZED] setting server invoker to SocketServerInvoker[127.0.0.1:4457]
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,724 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.callback.DefaultCallbackErrorHandler] DefaultCallbackErrorHandler[SocketServerInvoker[127.0.0.1:4457]] setting callback handler to ServerInvokerCallbackHandler[2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7m-6wc+2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7o-6wf]
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,724 DEBUG [org.jboss.jms.server.remoting.JMSServerInvocationHandler] adding callback handler ServerInvokerCallbackHandler[2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7m-6wc+2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7o-6wf]
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,724 DEBUG [org.jboss.jms.server.remoting.JMSServerInvocationHandler] found calllback handler for remoting session ...-g0jaad7m-6wc UID=2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7m-6wc
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,724 DEBUG [org.jboss.jms.server.connectionmanager.SimpleConnectionManager] registered connection ConnectionEndpoint[iw6-o7daaj0g-1-byjvoi0g-cdp89-y1d6u6c2] as ...-g0jaad7m-6wc
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,725 DEBUG [org.jboss.jms.server.security.SecurityMetadataStore] No SecurityMetadadata was available for Q_PENDING_MESSAGE_OUT, using default security config
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,726 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.ServerInvoker] Thread pool class supplied is not an object name.
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,731 DEBUG [org.jboss.jms.server.connectionmanager.SimpleConnectionManager] unregistered connection ConnectionEndpoint[iw6-o7daaj0g-1-byjvoi0g-cdp89-y1d6u6c2] with remoting session ID ...-g0jaad7m-6wc
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,731 DEBUG [org.jboss.jms.server.remoting.JMSServerInvocationHandler] removing callback handler ServerInvokerCallbackHandler[2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7m-6wc+2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7o-6wf]
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,731 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.InvokerRegistry] removed org.jboss.remoting.transport.local.LocalClientInvoker at 78c932 from registry
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,731 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.ServerInvoker] ServerInvoker (SocketServerInvoker[UNINITIALIZED]) removing client callback handler with session id of 2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7m-6wc+2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7o-6wf.
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,731 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.transport.bisocket.BisocketServerInvoker] unrecognized listener ID: 2c6u6d1y-98pdc-g0iovjyb-1-g0jaad7o-6wf
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,731 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.InvokerRegistry] removed org.jboss.remoting.transport.local.LocalClientInvoker at 1e0f1db from registry
  | 2009-10-08 09:06:02,731 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.ServerInvoker] SocketServerInvoker[UNINITIALIZED] stopped
  | 

I wonder if it doesn't have anything to do with this line : bisocket://84.246.229.70:1724524841
may be it should be 127.0.0.1 instead.
Any Thought ?

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4259342#4259342

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4259342