[jboss-user] [jBPM Users] - Re: [jBPM4] Synchronous process execution
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Tue Oct 13 12:56:11 EDT 2009
anonymous wrote : I understand what you are saying, but in my opinion the "to many (java) threads" should be at the user consideration, if I want to use them, the jBPM should give that option.
It's not something that could/should not be in jBPM, it's just that the combination of having a blocking process with waitstates is not something that has been requested a lot before (at all afaik) so there simple was not any time spent in realizing this.
With my 'previous post' I refered to the post in this topic, sorry for the confusion. Like I said, jBPM supports executing synchronous services and is blocking IF the services you call are all synchrounous. Since you do not seem to have a problem with blocking threads, you can create blocking services. That is even cleaner than jBPM providing it 'intrisically' ;-).
So this way you do not lose the 'synchronism' and I still think a thread blocking for possible long period (since you have human task) is a wrong design of a system with many downsides and possible problems like transactiontimeouts, etc.Maybe it is time to rethink some of your architecture.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4260138#4260138
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4260138
More information about the jboss-user