[jboss-user] [EJB 3.0 Development] New message: "Re: EJBTHREE-2007: VFS Abstraction"

[jaikiran pai]

User development,

A new message was posted in the thread "EJBTHREE-2007: VFS Abstraction":

http://community.jboss.org/message/524557#524557

Author  : jaikiran pai
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jaikiran

Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
> jaikiran wrote:
>  
> I don't mind having this new enforcer rule, but eventually i suspect that we are going to end up with a lengthy (trial and error, ever changing) excludes list 
A bit OT - If Maven allowed a way to exclude an artifact irrespective of from which artifact it get's pulled in transitively from, then instead of something like this:
 
<dependency>
      <groupId>org.hibernate</groupId>
      <artifactId>hibernate-annotations</artifactId>
      <version>${version.org.hibernate}</version>
      <!-- Exclude org.hibernate:hibernate which is banned in
      favour of org.hibernate:hibernate-core -->
      <exclusions>
        <exclusion>
            <groupId>org.hibernate</groupId>
            <artifactId>hibernate</artifactId>
        </exclusion>
      </exclusions>
    </dependency>

    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.hibernate</groupId>
      <artifactId>hibernate-entitymanager</artifactId>
      <version>${version.org.hibernate.hibernate-entitymanager}</version>
      <!-- Exclude org.hibernate:hibernate which is banned in
      favour of org.hibernate:hibernate-core -->
      <exclusions>
        <exclusion>
            <groupId>org.hibernate</groupId>
            <artifactId>hibernate</artifactId>
        </exclusion>
      </exclusions>
    </dependency>

 
we could just have had:
 
      <exclusions>
        <exclusion>
            <groupId>org.hibernate</groupId>
            <artifactId>hibernate</artifactId>
        <!-- Instruct Maven to exclude this artifact from any dependency
        of this project which pulls this in -->
        <include-transitive/>
        </exclusion>
      </exclusions>



--------------------------------------------------------------

To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/524557#524557